Saturday, February 20, 2010

Its a Wal Mart World After All

I was born in 1973.

That year the top employers in America by head count were General Electric and IBM.

The top employers in America now are Wal Mart and McDonalds.

In Texas the Gubner and the Feds are trying to ramrod though a new international toll road which would make Kansas City Missouri the point of entry for goods coming into America from Mexico.

Wal Mart is very much in support of this measure.

Not that there is anything wrong with getting our goods from Mexico. After all Americans don't make anything anymore so we have to get consumables from somewhere. But why should Wal Mart be in favor of this?

Simple.

When overseas goods are brought into the United States by plane or ship there are certain restrictions about labor practices (child labor being one) which prohibit some goods from being imported even though they are much cheaper having been manufactured by children in sweatshops in some country high school kids can't find on a map. (Ha ha I typed mao the first time that's kind of ironic) But these restrictions do not apply to goods which come into our country from Mexico because Nafta that great beacon of freedom and enterprise wiped such laws away meaning that textiles can be sewn in Mexico by children and that's fine, but from China... well that's a whole different kettle of fish. But it seems that child labor is cheaper in China than Mexico so retailers here have been trying to find a way to get around these laws and bump the profit margin in turn.

Well hooray for the good guys! The new trans Texas corridor would make any goods brought into our country from Mexico via that highway exempt from such laws since technically Mexico would be the country of origin. And since Mexico has no qualms with taking goods into their ports assembled by cheaper children overseas everybody wins. Child labor laws get circumvented, Wal Mart gets cheaper shirts, and we don't care at all.

And you see that is the rub.

I hear a lot of people bashing Wal Mart because of low pay and bad employment practices such as keeping people scheduled below the thirty-two hour per week threshold where the law would require them to offer some sort of medical insurance. I mean, don't get me wrong, bash away. Wal Mart is a multi national corporation which deliberately drives local economy out of business with satellite stores and then further hurts it by closing the smaller stores once the mom-and-pops are out of business and then opening 'Super Centers' in more centralized locations thus eliminating competition and at the same time shrinking the job base and compelling their customers to drive further knowing they will because what choice do they have.

Folks also complain that Wal Mart under staffs those super centers and those few who do work there are uniformly disgruntled. Thus the service sucks and the help you do get is put off and rude.

And would you like to know who knows this and doesn't care at all?

Wal Mart.

Wal Mart knows we hate their business practices. They also know we hate their service. They know we hate crowded aisles and long checkout lines and they will never never never do one single solitary stinking little thing about it. Ever!

And do you know why?

Because Wal Mart knows that no matter how much we hate those things, we really really really like cheap milk and shoes.

That's right folks its capitalism run amok where the consumer pays his hard cash to get screwed by the proprietor and is hunky ok fine with it because he just really doesn't see the sense in paying more than two hundred dollars for a new television. Hot damn who cares about child labor this shirt is fifteen dollars. Screw the unions the meat is cheap. Oh sure we care about local economy but man my Twinkies were on sale two-for- three dollars.

Yes folks you too can sign up for crappy service and cheap prices without regret because the retailers know that you will come back again and again just so long as the price threshold is low enough. Oh sure quality products and service would be nice but who wants to pay for it? And in a Wal Mart world you the consumer don't and therefore business will never change.

And do you know who else knows this?

Utility companies, car companies, home construction companies, fast food companies, wholesale food producers, oil companies, clothing companies, the mall, the government, your barber and the kid who cuts your grass. Sure the product is crap and the service is terrible but its cheap cheap cheap, and that is all we care about.

We may complain about illegal immigrants but we sure do like cheap produce and houses. We complain about big corporations raping the land but we sure do like cheaper gas and electricity. Texas operates more coal fired power plant than any state in the country and we could not care less because the power is sold at a price we don't choke on.

In fact the only time we ever complain about a corporation and actually do something about it is if that company sells tobacco, and then suddenly this all goes out the window. But not really. After all we are pissed at cigarette companies because Auntie Dear chose to commit slow suicide with their product and now she is going to cost us a lot A LOT of money before she dies because cancer ain't cheap.

Besides the tobacco situation evoked the flip side of the Wal Mart world.

The lottery world.

That's right folks give yourself cancer and then sue for millions and millions of dollars so your kids won't have to shop at Wal Mart when you're dead.

Everybody wins!!!!

Because we're Americans and we consume the whole world and build nothing but debt and waistlines while complaining complaining complaining that it is all Wal Mart's fault.

But it isn't.

Because every time we put a penny into Wal Mart's till and say nothing we vote for this world we live in. And if our actions are speaking that loudly no one will ever hear a damn word we're saying.

Just thinking.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Time to Rethink Some Myths

So I live in Texas which means that high political offices will always be held by the most popular republican. I am not against this on principle I am conservative and don't think that the dems have done an admirable job a running anything since.... Anyway. My issue is that the most popular republican in Texas is Rick Perry. This is a man who a cheerleader in college and is currently running on a small government/secession is good platform. Of course given that he is also trying to build a super highway between Mexico and Kansas City so Wal Mart won't have as much trouble getting goods manufactured by five years olds in dark sweatshops to market I have to wonder how anti-establishment he really is, but I digress.

Anyway the point is the republican I want to win is Kay Hutchinson. She won't but I wish she would. But the thing that gets me is the other day I heard some right to life group saying that Kay was pro-abortion because she will not support an out and out overturning of Roe V Wade, and I want to talk about that.

First off let me say that abortion is murder.

So there now that I have identified myself as a dangerous wacko let me get to the point.

In not saying that she would support an out and out overturning of Roe the senator was actually showing a keen understanding of the law. The thing is, abortion was legal before the Roe decision. It was not legal in every state and neither was it available carte blanch but there was no overriding federal which outlawed abortion in this country. It did not exist. The laws instead were handled at the state level and the one in question which led to Roe was a law which said that a married woman must have the permission of her husband before getting an abortion. Notice, it was not a law which outlawed abortion but restricted it. The court ruled that such a law amounted to a violation of privacy and struck down such laws.

Two things have happened since.

One, there has been a mountain of case law written on top of the presupposition of a right to privacy (which yours truly does not believe exists) and included in that law is a volume of criminal law a great deal of which has been used to help convict people and put them in prison for a long long time. If Roe were struck down all such law would go with it and years of civil and criminal lawsuits would have to be reopened to see if they passed constitutional muster apart from Roe.

Two, there has been a mountain of law written concerning restrictions on abortion such as parental notification laws, mandatory sonogram laws, partial birth abortion bans, and born alive laws just to name a few which have all been found to pass constitutional muster in light of Roe. All such laws would be again subjected to legal challenge if Roe were overturned and even perhaps thrown out all together because the High Court decision upon which such law was written would have been nullified.

So far from supporting abortion, what Kay said is that any such over turning would need to be carefully considered.

But the hair model who's currently governor in my home state does not understand such fine distinctions, and clearly neither did the group which made the commercial. Instead they re counting on the voter being too stupid and lazy to dig past the sound bite and try to grasp what the real issue is, and considering that as of today Governor Dick is ahead by 10+ in the polls I would say they have Texans just about pegged.

Just thinking.